Zimpfer vs palm beach county case

This is a case of age based discrimination. Zimpfer decided to apply for. Palm Beach County Case Zimpfer vs. He could also look to see if Palm Beach County has a trend of passing up older employees for younger employees when filling up managerial positions.

He could produce the job performance reports he has received while working for the county that show him to be an exemplary worker, and recommend him for promotion.

There was a vacancy which was advertised by the county for the position of employee relations manager, a position which Mr. Zimpfer is able to perform satisfactorily at some absolute or relative level; 3 Mr. It could be that he was not able to convince the interview panel that he actually possessed those skills.

To come up with scores, Dr. Lynn Szymoniak to pursue his case. Merriman performed better than Mr.

Zimpfer vs. Palm Beach County Case

I would also recommend recording or keeping minutes of each interview. He could introduce transcripts of the interviews of both men which would help prove that Mr.

Since Zimpfer had been working with the county for 16 years, they would be able to get some more information about him from his past and present supervisors. Potential Rebuttal Evidence Needed for the County The attorney for the HR manager for Palm Beach County could introduce some additional evidence that would help prove that his client did not discriminate against Mr.

Knolls Atomic Power Lab, U. Requirement 2 on the other hand might be a little tricky to prove. This was established in the Supreme Court case Meacham v. We will write a custom essay sample on Zimpfer vs. The relevant code section is 29 U.

In case of Palm Beach County, Mr. This is a blanket ban against age discrimination. This being the case, I would recommend they settle the suit outside the court. Zimpfer was nor hired, promoted, or compensated, or was discharged, laid off, or forced to retire; and 4 that the position was filled by a person younger than Mr.

After considering all the applications, the county chose a candidate, Mr. He might not have the experience of Mr. Since Brad has been appointed, even though he has less experience than Bryce, the onus lies on the Palm Beach County to establish that there was no age based discrimination.

Merriman on the other hand could have been more convincing during his interview. The references related to the answer are also included.

It also could be that she intentionally left out information that would be unfavorable to her client. The department filled the position with Mr.

Josephs is able to convince this jury then there is sufficient evidence to conclusively prove that Mr. Zimpfer was a victim of discrimination, since her report shows that he is clearly more qualified for the position than Mr.Palm Beach County” case is about a lawsuit filed by Mr.

Bryce Zimpfer against Palm Beach County alleging a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Mr. Zimpher, age 52, has worked for the county’s employee relations area and this employment had lasted for 16 years.

There was a vacancy which was advertised by [ ]. Bryce Zimpfer against Palm Beach County alleging a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Mr. Zimpher, age 52, has worked for the county’s employee relations area and this employment had lasted for 16 years. There was a vacancy which was advertised by the county for the position of.

Dante Anchelia September 10, Prof. Bernardin Ex.

Zimpfer v Palm Beach County Case Study

Zimpfer V. Palm Beach County Mr. Zimpfer was a victim of illegal age discrimination because his qualifications well exceeded the qualifications of J. Brad Merriman– the candidate ultimately selected for the position.

The Age discrimination in employment Act (ADEA) was designed to %(3).

Zimpfer v. Palm Beach County*, 853 F.2d 929 (11th Cir. 1988)

Read the case “Zimpfer Vs Palm Beach County”. Also read the chapter on Equal Employment Opportunity with specific emphasis on Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the lecture supplements on Equal Employment. Read the attached case study documents and answer the following questions in words or more about Zimpfer v Palm Beach County: 1.

Was Mr. Zimpfer a victim of illegal age discrimination according to the ADEA and case law? Why. Zimpfer vs. Palm Beach County: The Zimpfer vs. Palm Beach County Case is a lawsuit filed by Mr.

Bryce Zimpfer against Palm Beach County claiming an infringement of the age discrimination in the Equal Employment Opportunity Act.

Download
Zimpfer vs palm beach county case
Rated 0/5 based on 25 review